Object Oriented Software Engineering View all facts Glossary Help |
subject > criterion > quality > software quality > external software quality |
external software quality comparison table |
Subject | solve | change | measure in | consist of | over-constrain | specify as | cut | increase by | is a subtopic of | lead to | affect by | measure | gather from | has part | depends on | reduce | express as | constrain by | give | is a kind of | agree upon by | analysed | group with | improve by | show as | affect indirectly by | indicate | restrict | have | express in | express using | has definition | describe | be |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
efficiency | 1.5 - Software Quality | how much CPU-time, memory, disk-space, network bandwidth or other resources software uses | software architecture | measurement | The extent to which a product or process can operate using the fewest possible resources | important to customers in order to reduce their costs of running the software | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
maintainability | the use of modularity | 1.5 - Software Quality | complexity of code | costs for both developers and customers | software architecture | measurement | An important quality of software that measures the extent to which the software can be modified at the lowest possible cost | the ease with which the software can be changed | hard to assess | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
reliability | a customer's problem | whenever the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs | the design of the system | the average amount of time between failures or the probability of a failure in a given period | if cost-benefit analysis shows that it will have minimum benefit but still cost a lot to develop | 4.5 - Types of Requirements | a system of sufficient quality - one that is sufficiently usable, safe, efficient, reliable and maintainable | complexity of code | various stakeholders, other software systems and any documentation that might be available | problem statement | the number of mistakes made by the software engineers who developed the software | a fact | a unique number for traceability | non-functional requirement | all stakeholders | if there is any doubt whether it is realistic | other requirements into a requirements document | ensuring the software is easy to implement and change, and also ensuring that if failures occur, the system can handle them or can recover easily | a diagram | commenting | how it will be implemented in order to give the designer as much freedom as possible to make decisions | the freedom of software engineers as they make design decisions because it limits what resources can be used and sets bounds on aspects of the software's quality | benefits that outweigh the costs of development | a natural language such as English (using present tense and active voice), sometimes supplemented by a formal mathematical language, and often by some form of diagram | clear and consistent notation, using language that the customers can understand, and consistent with the other requirements | An important quality of software that measures the frequency of failures, as encountered by testers and end-users | a constraint that must be adhered to during development | more important than efficiency in a safety-critical system | ||||||
reusability | 9.2 - Principles Leading to Good Design | software architecture | measurement | A quality that measures of the extent to which a product or process can be used in different contexts from which it was originally designed | hard to assess | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
usefulness | the context of particular types of users | utility^2 and usability | 7.4 - The Basics of User Interface Design | measurement | The extent to which a system can be used to perform a task; combines usability and utility^2 | essential |
Next software quality: identity Up: software quality Previous software quality: error handling